Q&A #2

Posted: November 13, 2007 in Uncategorized

Ian over at Or So I Thought asked me this question:

A political question: How do you regard the late nicotine and booze addicted, but formerly brilliant journalist and war correspondent, Rene Levesque? I really don’t know how Rene is regarded in the Quebec of aujourd hui.Personally, I admire him both as a jouralist and because he hated Trudeau’s guts — and for good reason.

Sheesh.. Politics. But at least this one is an intersting question. Because the whole dog and pony show of politics usually bores me to tears. Or sends me into paroxysms of hilarity. Rarely anything else.

René Lévesque. There’s a subject…

First off, I’ve never been a separatist. I can understand why people would be, most of my friends are or have been including Mr. Jazz. That does not make them wrong, nor does it make them idiots (as a federalist colleague of mine once said). I happen to believe – even as a French Quebecer (’cause despite my angloness, I am first and foremost French) – that Quebec can make it as an integral part of Canada.

Which puts me squarely on the opposite side of Lévesque.

Actually though, contrary to many federalists, I’ve never considered him the bad guy . Nope, he was not the antichrist. I really liked him and always thought he was a brilliant man. Granted, sometimes he annoyed the hell out of me, but a lot of peole annoy me now and then.

René Lévesque was that oh so rare bird in politics. The exception that confirms the rule. He had integrity. He really believed in what he was trying to do, not as an opportunist who figures there’s money to be made, there’s power to be had, but as a man who really believed the only way for Quebec was through separation. (I can just hear some people I know saying “how did she live to that age and still be so damn naive”) I sometimes think, looking back that he must have found the burden of Premiership and PQ party icon really hard to shoulder – he doesn’t strike me as having been that kind of person. Obviously he was ambitious, you don’t get into politics if you’re not, but he seemed to truly be an idealist.

He had charisma galore, though not the Trudeaumania intellectual “it boy” charisma. He appealed to ordinary people because he was one of them. He appealed to those who actually worked hard to scrape by, people exactly like he was; he wasn’t from a rich background. And this, much to the gall of the establishment, who, lets face it, sees the “unwashed masses” as, well, basically nothing important.

When he lost the first referendum I felt really bad for him, even though I had voted against.

And the PQ then started its time honoured tradition of taking out its leaders and quarreling in pubic. He must have been devastated when they turned against him and forced him out of the party he founded…

Which brings us to another point. René Lévesque was obviously crushed when he lost the first referendum, but he was never petty. He said well, it didn’t work. Next time maybe. He didn’t blame – in the infamous words of Jacques Parizeau after the second referendum – “money and the ethnic vote”. He respected that people could think differently from him, he was never mean-sprited about the defeat – at least in public.

And I don’t think he would ever have accepted presenting a projet proposing a Quebec citizenship while Quebec was still part of Canada. For me that’s totally unacceptable – but that’s another blog (besides, BB said it really well in this blog).

And there you have it. Hope I answered your question Ian.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Ian Lidster says:

    Brilliant response, ma cherie. You answered many questions for me. Living out here in the fringe of ‘Cascadia’ we sometimes have problems ‘understanding’ the grumblings from Quebec. Actually, there are separatist impulses here and in Alberta that are much more widespread than the Toronto-oriented media ever give credence to, but that is another matter.But, it was so good to get your insider’s view of the situation, and of Rene himself. Actually, his quest didn’t fall on deaf ears out here, entirely. I think probably for the most part that he seemed to represent a ‘fuck Ottawa’ stance, which was very popular with not a few British Columbians. For us the ‘evil over the mountains’ was never so much Quebec as Toronto/Ottawa. It would be shameful here to be a Leafs fan, but to back the Habs is just dandy.

  2. CS says:

    Yes, brilliant response, ma… Oh, alright, I have no idea who we’re talking about (hanging her head).

  3. I.A.M.L. says:

    You know, I enjoyed reading this post of yours. I sure have come to see things differently since being married to a french canadian myself.JP (jean-pierre) is constantly teaching me about acceptance and showing me how judgemental I’ve been in my political opinions without really giving it a fair amount of thought.

  4. Josie says:

    I have always liked René Lévesque. I always thought he was the “real deal”. As you say, he had integrity and believed in what he was doing. The only thing artificial about him was that comb-over.Oh, that comb-over… 🙂

  5. Tai says:

    It’s rather too bad that there aren’t more politicians that honestly believe in what there doing.I think the dollar signs from kick-backs impede judgement, no?

  6. Tai says:

    I meant ‘their’, obviously. 🙂

  7. Hey – how come you get intelligent political questions for your NaBloPoMo Q & A and I get questions about Clamato?

  8. Jazz says:

    Ian – Funny how Toronto seems to be the enemy for so many. Sort of like Montreal is the enemy in Quebec – especially for Quebec city.CS – Being American you are excused. I have no freaking idea who your governor is either.IAML – Politics has a nasty tendancy to bring out the judgemental.Josie – Oh yeah, the comb-over. Damn that was a nasty comb-overTai – And now Mulroney is on the block… And of course you meant “their”

  9. Jazz says:

    UP – Because it’s not NaBloPoMo (god that acronym cracks me up). I wouldn’t ever be able to blog every day for a month straight. I thought the clamato question was a riot… I had no idea the stuff was Canadian, eh?

  10. Jocelyn says:

    I think I just learned more than I have since……I first learned to walk.Wow.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s