Hey look! Canada made it into Slate!

Posted: September 13, 2008 in Uncategorized

What’s the Matter With Canada?
How the world’s nicest country turned mean.
Posted Friday, Sept. 12, 2008, at 11:17 AM ET
By Christopher Flavelle

Last Sunday, news came that Canada—sensible, quiet, some would even say boring Canada—will hold an election on Oct. 14, its third in four years. Those outside the country may wonder what the problem is; in Canada, after all, health care is free, the dollar is strong, same-sex marriage is legal, and the government had the good sense to stay out of Iraq. You might think of Canada as the un-America, where the only debate ought to be whether to spend the country’s growing oil wealth on faster snowmobiles, bigger hockey rinks, or Anne Murray box sets.

But beneath the calm exterior, Canada’s political system is in turmoil. Since 2004, a succession of unstable minority governments has led to a constant campaign frenzy, brutalizing Canada’s once-broad political consensus and producing a series of policies at odds with the country’s socially liberal, fiscally conservative identity. Canada is quietly becoming a political basket case, and this latest election may make things even worse.

Just scan the headlines. In June, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development warned that Canada—for years the only G8 country to post regular budget surpluses—was likely to fall into deficit this year, thanks to a reckless cut to the national sales tax. In February, the government proposed denying funding to films and TV shows whose content it deemed “not in the public interest,” sparking cries of censorship from a sector that has historically received public support. In 2007, a member of the governing Conservative Party proposed a bill that would reopen the debate over abortion, a topic that governments both liberal and conservative have avoided for decades.

The country is projecting its uncharacteristic behavior abroad as well. After decades of encouraging countries to increase their foreign-aid spending, Canada cut its own, from 0.34 percent of GDP in 2005 to just 0.2 percent last year. Long a beacon of human rights, Ottawa announced last fall that it would stop advocating on behalf of Canadians sentenced to death in other countries. And Canada is now the only Western country that still has one of its citizens held in Guantanamo, but Ottawa has refused to press for his release.

But nowhere is the rift between the old and new Canada more apparent than with regards to the environment. Canada was an early and enthusiastic supporter of the fight against climate change, and as recently as 2005 it was the Canadian environment minister who helped broker an agreement to extend the Kyoto Protocol beyond 2012. Then last December, at a U.N. conference in Bali to negotiate a successor to Kyoto, Canada executed a neat 180-degree turn, trying to block an agreement that set a target for future cuts to greenhouse-gas emissions. Of the 190 countries at the conference, only Russia supported Canada’s position.

Left-leaning Canadians blame the country’s predicament on the current Conservative government, which was first elected two years ago. They’re right, to a point. The Conservative Party, formed five years ago in a merger of the country’s two right-wing parties, is Canada’s first experience with an anti-government, socially conservative party in the mold of Reagan-Bush Republicans. Its leader, Stephen Harper, who is now the prime minister, once called Canada “a Northern European welfare state in the worst sense of the term.”

But the Conservative Party wouldn’t be in power, let alone willing to risk such divisive policies, were it not for the collapse of the country’s most formidable political institution, the Liberal Party of Canada. The Liberals have been Canada’s left-wing standard-bearers since the country’s independence in 1867. And just as Canada’s right-wing parties were coming together, the Liberal Party was coming apart.

In early 2004, Canada’s auditor-general found that under the Liberal government, public funds intended to promote the federal government in the province of Quebec had been diverted toward advertising companies connected to the Liberal Party in the form of inflated payments. In response, the prime minister called a public inquiry, which only prolonged the controversy.

In the 2004 election, the Liberal government was reduced from a majority to a minority. Nineteen months later, it lost power entirely, and the party’s leader resigned. The Liberals then embarked on a long, fractious leadership campaign—leaving the party exhausted and broke, and tempting the governing Conservatives to introduce ever more draconian policies with little fear of the consequences.

As the Liberals work on rebuilding, Canada’s other left-wing party, the New Democratic Party, has grown at their expense; the Green Party, long a fringe movement in Canada, gained its first member of parliament when an independent MP joined the Greens; and the Bloc Québécois, which shares many Liberal positions but advocates for Quebec’s independence, remains a force in that province. The Conservatives may not represent the views of most Canadians, but with four parties fighting for the left-wing vote, the Conservatives might win simply by sliding up the middle.

Italians and Israelis may have learned how to function under minority governments, but Canadians are still working on it. If the current election ends in a third consecutive minority government, the polarization of Canadian politics will continue, and with it the brutal, zero-sum politicking that has left the country in convulsions.

If the last week is any indication, that polarization is only getting worse. On Sunday morning, Prime Minister Harper began the race by predicting “a very nasty kind of personal-attack campaign.” Two days later, his party briefly released an ad that showed a bird defecating on the leader of the Liberal Party. So much for Canadians being nice.

This is the link

Advertisements
Comments
  1. furiousBall says:

    what is this “Canada” that you speak of? is that where all the waffles come from?

  2. geewits says:

    I still don’t get the part about randomly calling elections. It’s kinda creepy. I don’t know how Canada got the reputation of the nice thing, maybe accepting all the draft dodgers, but when I was there, people were just people.

  3. xup says:

    This is a very good, if frightening, synopsis of the situation, Jazz. We are indeed a political basket case and this election is certainly not going to make things any better.

  4. Urban Animal says:

    Great article! So true. This election is a farce but I guess Harper thought he can win it otherwise, there’s no way in hell he would have called it. IMO, Canada has long had that reputation with our behavior outside the country. I think we’re very different at home 🙂 Geewits, unfortunately, our system makes that if a government is a minority, the other parties can force an early election. However, in this case, it’s the governing party that called it early. It’s not common to see that happen. Only arrogant leaders can do it 🙂

  5. Rachel says:

    I’m just spectulating here, but perhaps the reason for Harper calling for a new election is because he thinks that doing so will shift the balance of power in Legislature to his favor? Is the reason to think the people od Canada will vote in more Conservatives into office? sounds like HE thinks so?

  6. Jazz says:

    Fuball – No silly! That’s Belgium. Canada is where Santa Clause comes from.Geewits – That’s cause you guys are in election mode 99% of the time. Like UA said, in a minority government you can force the governing party into an election. Or, as in this case, if you’re pretty certain you’ll end up with a majority government, you can call an election, which is what Harper is doing. Generally elections take place every 4 or so years, but we’ve been plagued with a few minority governments lately so we’re always having elections. The funny thing is, Harper had a law voted (I seem to recall) saying that elections could only be held at fixed intervals – and he has gone against it already seeing as calling an election now means he’ll probably get in as a majority government. Or something… BlehXUP – Well, now maybe they’ll ship us all off to that padded room.UA – most elections are a farce, but then I hold unbounded cynicism regarding politicians.Rachel – That’s exactly it. Chances are good he will get in with a majority government this time, which is why he called the election. The pendulum in Canada (as in the US) is still swinging to the right – way to far right for comfort in my opinion.

  7. Jocelyn says:

    So is this the post where, at long last, you declare your intentions to run for office?I would totally become Canadian to vote for you.

  8. Jazz says:

    Joce – And I would totally make you my “person in the shadows who actually runs things while I host parties for heads of state”.

  9. Winona says:

    Well written article.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s